Powered by Invision Power Board


  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Response to letter in FT

Posted: October 11, 2006 09:09 pm  
Quote Post



Manape
*******
Member No.: 4
Joined: February 01, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 728




MSN
In response to this letter in the Financial Times, we've sent the following response:

QUOTE
Sir,

In his recent letter discussing evolution, Ian Leonard stretches the definition of "faith" to breaking point and beyond (letters, 7 Oct).

Evolutionary biology is based on careful scrutiny of the world we live in. It is continually subjected to testing and improvement to ensure its accuracy. It produces concrete, testable predictions of stunning accuracy, and is critical to vital fields of science such as immunology.

For example, evolutionary models have been used to predict the spread of the deadly disease Ebola in Africa, as well as to trace the source of HIV infections in the US. More recently, simulated evolution techniques known as "in vitro evolution" have been applied to the development of more effective antibiotics. Evolutionary biology is practical, functional, and effective.

Leonard is correct that intelligent individuals are, at present, questioning and challenging every aspect of evolution. These people are usually referred to as "evolutionary biologists", and they have spent most of the last 150 years hunting down and eliminating weaknesses in the theory, as well as searching for major flaws in the underlying premises. So far, so good.

Finally, the impression given by Leonard's letter that evolutionary biology is incompatible with Christianity is simply not true. The scientific community contains many Christians, the majority of whom accept evolution for the accurate model that it is.

Yours sincerely,
Alex Labram
Science Just Science


FYI: the letter we're replying to is a response to a favourable review of Dawkins' latest. Obviously SJS takes no position on Dawkins' philosophical conclusions - we're responding purely to the inaccuracies in the writer's characterisation of evolutionary biology.


--------------------
Religion == Faith =/= Doubt == Science
 
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top

  Posted: October 11, 2006 09:24 pm  
Quote Post



Humanoid
********
Member No.: 6
Joined: February 02, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 1283




AOLYahooMSN
Interesting ... I never read his letter as favourable. Neutral perhaps but not favourable.

Your response is cool though.

Kyu


--------------------
Kyuuketsuki
Co-Founder: 'Science, Just Science' Campaign & Editor: UK Tech Portal

"And the notion of evolution as it’s presented by creationists sounds absurd. I mean, you have to be a moron to believe in evolution, at least the way they present it."
Michael Shermer
 
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top

Posted: October 11, 2006 09:34 pm  
Quote Post



Large Mammal
******
Member No.: 17
Joined: February 03, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 407




QUOTE (Corkscrew @ October 11, 2006 10:09 pm)
In response to this letter in the Financial Times, we've sent the following response:

QUOTE
Sir,

In his recent letter discussing evolution, Ian Leonard stretches the definition of "faith" to breaking point and beyond (letters, 7 Oct).

Evolutionary biology is based on careful scrutiny of the world we live in. It is continually subjected to testing and improvement to ensure its accuracy. It produces concrete, testable predictions of stunning accuracy, and is critical to vital fields of science such as immunology.

For example, evolutionary models have been used to predict the spread of the deadly disease Ebola in Africa, as well as to trace the source of HIV infections in the US. More recently, simulated evolution techniques known as "in vitro evolution" have been applied to the development of more effective antibiotics. Evolutionary biology is practical, functional, and effective.

Leonard is correct that intelligent individuals are, at present, questioning and challenging every aspect of evolution. These people are usually referred to as "evolutionary biologists", and they have spent most of the last 150 years hunting down and eliminating weaknesses in the theory, as well as searching for major flaws in the underlying premises. So far, so good.

Finally, the impression given by Leonard's letter that evolutionary biology is incompatible with Christianity is simply not true. The scientific community contains many Christians, the majority of whom accept evolution for the accurate model that it is.

Yours sincerely,
Alex Labram
Science Just Science


FYI: the letter we're replying to is a response to a favourable review of Dawkins' latest. Obviously SJS takes no position on Dawkins' philosophical conclusions - we're responding purely to the inaccuracies in the writer's characterisation of evolutionary biology.

Corkscrew

Looks good to me. I would suggest just a few adjustments if you don't mind:

Where you hae "so far so good". I would expand to someting along the lines of

"So far the the theory has stood up to this critical examination: no serious flaws have been found"

and
where you have "The scientific community contains many Christians, the majority of whom accept evolution for the accurate model that it is."

I woud have "The CoE,a the Catholic Church and all major denominations accept evolution, and the scientific community contains many Christians, the vast majority of whom are happy to accept evolution for the accurate model that it is."


--------------------
Data is not information. Information is not knowledge. Knowledge is not wisdom. Intelligent Design is not science.
 
PMEmail Poster
Top

Posted: October 12, 2006 06:39 pm  
Quote Post



Manape
*******
Member No.: 4
Joined: February 01, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 728




MSN
I just got a letter asking that I give them my address "so that my letter may be considered for publication".

This seems promising to me - does anyone know what conclusions may be drawn from this response?


--------------------
Religion == Faith =/= Doubt == Science
 
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top

  Posted: October 12, 2006 08:37 pm  
Quote Post



Humanoid
********
Member No.: 6
Joined: February 02, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 1283




AOLYahooMSN
QUOTE (Corkscrew @ October 12, 2006 07:39 pm)
I just got a letter asking that I give them my address "so that my letter may be considered for publication".

This seems promising to me - does anyone know what conclusions may be drawn from this response?

You have done well my young Padawan

Kyu


--------------------
Kyuuketsuki
Co-Founder: 'Science, Just Science' Campaign & Editor: UK Tech Portal

"And the notion of evolution as it’s presented by creationists sounds absurd. I mean, you have to be a moron to believe in evolution, at least the way they present it."
Michael Shermer
 
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top

Posted: October 12, 2006 08:52 pm  
Quote Post



Manape
*******
Member No.: 4
Joined: February 01, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 728




MSN
Master, I fear I am turning to the dark side...

... no wait, that spinning sensation is just the beer. My bad.


--------------------
Religion == Faith =/= Doubt == Science
 
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top

Posted: October 12, 2006 09:08 pm  
Quote Post



Large Mammal
******
Member No.: 17
Joined: February 03, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 407




QUOTE (Corkscrew @ October 12, 2006 07:39 pm)
I just got a letter asking that I give them my address "so that my letter may be considered for publication".

This seems promising to me - does anyone know what conclusions may be drawn from this response?

They want to confirm that you are genuine. They may ask for a phone number and call you back. That happened to me the first time I wrote a letter to the Glasgow Herald.


--------------------
Data is not information. Information is not knowledge. Knowledge is not wisdom. Intelligent Design is not science.
 
PMEmail Poster
Top

Posted: October 13, 2006 10:21 am  
Quote Post



Arachnid
***
Member No.: 52
Joined: February 28, 2006
Group: Sixth Formers
Posts: 54




Nice letter. Newspapers always ask for addresses, and often daytime telephone numbers, to confirm you are reasonably genuine. I have been getting letters published in the papers for 6 years now, and always attach my name and address and telephone number.
 
PMEmail Poster
Top

Posted: October 14, 2006 02:34 pm  
Quote Post



Manape
*******
Member No.: 4
Joined: February 01, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 728




MSN


--------------------
Religion == Faith =/= Doubt == Science
 
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top

Posted: October 14, 2006 03:15 pm  
Quote Post



Large Mammal
******
Member No.: 8
Joined: February 02, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 459




Well done mate!
 
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top

Posted: October 14, 2006 04:06 pm  
Quote Post



Large Mammal
******
Member No.: 17
Joined: February 03, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 407




QUOTE (Corkscrew @ October 14, 2006 03:34 pm)
SCORE!!!!

Excellent!

Well done!

Think you may prompt a resposnse?


--------------------
Data is not information. Information is not knowledge. Knowledge is not wisdom. Intelligent Design is not science.
 
PMEmail Poster
Top

Posted: October 14, 2006 04:17 pm  
Quote Post



Manape
*******
Member No.: 4
Joined: February 01, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 728




MSN
QUOTE
Think you may prompt a resposnse?


Could do. Although my bet is that any such response will merely be a list of icons-of-evolution style creationist talking points rather than actually addressing any of my letter.


--------------------
Religion == Faith =/= Doubt == Science
 
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top

Posted: October 14, 2006 07:03 pm  
Quote Post



Small Mammal
*****
Member No.: 72
Joined: April 11, 2006
Group: Sixth Formers
Posts: 121




Nice one. It'll be worth checking the FT's letters over the next seven days to see if there's any response from the C/ID crowd.

Jim.


--------------------
UK skeptics' events listing
If in doubt, ASKE.
 
PMEmail Poster
Top

  Posted: October 14, 2006 09:17 pm  
Quote Post



Humanoid
********
Member No.: 6
Joined: February 02, 2006
Group: Moderators
Posts: 1283




AOLYahooMSN
QUOTE (Corkscrew @ October 14, 2006 03:34 pm)
SCORE!!!!

Seriously well done mate biggrin.gif

Kyu


--------------------
Kyuuketsuki
Co-Founder: 'Science, Just Science' Campaign & Editor: UK Tech Portal

"And the notion of evolution as it’s presented by creationists sounds absurd. I mean, you have to be a moron to believe in evolution, at least the way they present it."
Michael Shermer
 
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll